Who Reviews the Bookkeeper's Work When Your Company Is Too Small for a Controller?
Photo: Mikhail Nilov / Pexels. Illustrative stock image.
A company does not need a full-time controller to assign responsibility for reviewing its bookkeeping. It does need someone qualified to examine the work, question unusual items, and confirm that unresolved issues are addressed. The scope should be clear enough that both the owner and the bookkeeper know what “reviewed” means.
In a small South Florida business, the owner may approve bills, check the bank balance, and assume the monthly reports are ready to use. Those activities answer different questions. Approving a payment does not establish that it was recorded correctly, and an attractive dashboard does not explain the evidence behind its balances.
Separate preparation from review
Start by documenting what the bookkeeper prepares. This might include bank reconciliations, transaction coding, customer and vendor balances, payroll entries, and a monthly reporting package. The actual scope depends on the engagement.
Next, identify who reviews each area and what that review includes. Some questions require accounting judgment beyond the preparer's role or experience. A fractional accounting professional or controller may be appropriate for those areas even when the company cannot justify a full-time position.
Avoid assigning a technical review to an employee solely because they are trustworthy or good with spreadsheets. Trust and competence matter, but they are not interchangeable.
Define a useful monthly review package
Ask for a package that connects the financial reports with the underlying work. Depending on the business, it may include completed reconciliations, significant balance details, unusual transactions, and an open-question list.
For every unresolved item, request four details: what is unclear, the potential effect on the reports, the person who can resolve it, and the expected resolution date.
The reviewer should distinguish between completed work, reasonable estimates that need explanation, and missing information that prevents a conclusion. A report can be timely while still requiring clearly identified follow-up.
The owner should know which numbers are ready for a business decision and which remain subject to adjustment.
Focus attention where judgment matters
A review should do more than confirm that totals add up. Ask the accounting professional to define the transactions and balances that deserve particular attention in your business.
These might include unfamiliar vendors, unusual entries, owner transactions, unexplained balances, or significant changes from the prior period. The purpose is to understand the activity and supporting evidence, not to assume every unusual transaction is improper.
Consider a hypothetical service business whose software costs rise sharply. The explanation could be a new annual contract, duplicate subscriptions, an incorrect classification, or several valid additions. The useful question is which explanation the records support and whether the owner needs to act.
Give the owner a manageable role
The owner should not have to recreate the books. The owner's role is to provide business context, approve decisions within their authority, and ensure the review questions receive answers.
A short monthly discussion can cover unexpected results, outstanding accounting judgments, recurring process problems, and decisions requiring approval. Ask the reviewer to explain material issues in ordinary language and identify their practical effect.
Keep payment authorization and access permissions explicit. In a small team, one person may have several responsibilities; that makes it especially important to decide which actions require another person's approval and how that approval is documented.
Close questions instead of collecting them
An open-question list becomes useful when someone maintains it through resolution. Record the answer, the evidence, any correction, and who reviewed the result.
Look for patterns. Repeated missing receipts may point to an expense process problem. Frequent payroll questions may indicate a weak handoff between HR and accounting. An owner who answers the same coding question every month may need to clarify the underlying policy.
Use these patterns to improve the workflow rather than simply purchasing more cleanup hours.
Is a bookkeeping review the same as an audit?
Do not assume it is. Ask the provider to describe the engagement, deliverables, and any assurance being provided. A routine internal review should not be presented to a lender or other party as an audit or another formal assurance engagement.
Your next action
Ask two questions before the next month closes: “Who reviews the books?” and “What evidence shows that the review is complete?” If the answers are vague, define a modest, specific review scope.
Leyda Lazo and Human Capital Consultants International (HCCI) help owners clarify operating responsibilities and people-related handoffs. HRO FullScope can support the HR and payroll coordination that feeds financial processes. Pair that ownership clarity with qualified fractional accounting support for the accounting judgments your business needs.
Comments